linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nfs-anna tree with the fscache tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Dec 2021 06:40:16 -0500
From:   David Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...il.com>,
        NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nfs-anna tree with the fscache tree

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 7:35 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nfs-anna tree got conflicts in:
>
>   fs/nfs/fscache.c
>   fs/nfs/fscache.h
>   fs/nfs/fscache-index.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   882ff66585ec ("nfs: Convert to new fscache volume/cookie API")
>
> from the fscache tree and commits:
>
>   e89edabcb3d4 ("NFS: Remove remaining usages of NFSDBG_FSCACHE")
>   0d20bd7faac9 ("NFS: Cleanup usage of nfs_inode in fscache interface and handle i_size properly")
>   4a0574909596 ("NFS: Rename fscache read and write pages functions")
>   3b779545aa01 ("NFS: Convert NFS fscache enable/disable dfprintks to tracepoints")
>   b9077ca60a13 ("NFS: Replace dfprintks with tracepoints in fscache read and write page functions")
>   416de7e7eeb6 ("NFS: Remove remaining dfprintks related to fscache cookies")
>   fcb692b98976 ("NFS: Use nfs_i_fscache() consistently within NFS fscache code")
>
Anna, feel free to drop these from your tree to avoid the conflicts
with the rest of your tree and dhowells fscache-rewrite patchset.



> from the nfs-anna tree.
>
> I had no idea how to fix this all up, so I just dropped the nfs-anna
> tree for today.   Please get together and coordinate thses changes.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell