[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLf0FHYt-+4hEG3FkecrBJOwd=ub_yeEKWZ1DKPUycgkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:39:13 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
"open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)"
<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: pata_of_platform: Use of_irq_to_resource() to
populate IRQ resource
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 6:12 PM Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
>
> platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static
> allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue
> when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property
> in the node as this bypassed the hierarchical setup and messed up the
> irq chaining.
>
> In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core
> code use of_irq_to_resource().
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> Dropping usage of platform_get_resource() was agreed based on
> the discussion [0].
>
> [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/
> patch/20211209001056.29774-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com/
>
> Cheers,
> Prabhakar
> ---
> drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c b/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c
> index 35aa158fc976..557f349eb533 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/ata_platform.h>
> #include <linux/libata.h>
> @@ -25,11 +26,12 @@ static int pata_of_platform_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> struct device_node *dn = ofdev->dev.of_node;
> struct resource io_res;
> struct resource ctl_res;
> - struct resource *irq_res;
> + struct resource irq_res;
> unsigned int reg_shift = 0;
> int pio_mode = 0;
> int pio_mask;
> bool use16bit;
> + int irq;
>
> ret = of_address_to_resource(dn, 0, &io_res);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -45,7 +47,9 @@ static int pata_of_platform_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - irq_res = platform_get_resource(ofdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
> + irq = of_irq_to_resource(dn, 0, &irq_res);
No, platform_get_irq() please. I really want to get rid of the 4 users
of of_irq_to_resource() in the tree, not add more.
Yeah, that means __pata_platform_probe() needs to change, but it's all
of 2 callers. Really, I think pata_platform.c and pata_of_platform.c
should be merged. I'm guessing the separation traces back to DT using
a different bus type.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists