[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV0N-15kNZ1fnzaj_psNVCRUQP506Noc-tHawmgxqCVeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:43:10 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Bin Meng <bin.meng@...driver.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Lewis Hanly <lewis.hanly@...rochip.com>,
daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com, ivan.griffin@...rochip.com,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/17] riscv: dts: microchip: add fpga fabric section
to icicle kit
Hi Conor,
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:33 AM <conor.dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> Split the device tree for the Microchip MPFS into two sections by adding
> microchip-mpfs-fabric.dtsi, which contains peripherals contained in the
> FPGA fabric.
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-fabric.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> +/* Copyright (c) 2020-2021 Microchip Technology Inc */
> +
> +/ {
> + corePWM0: pwm@...00000 {
> + compatible = "microchip,corepwm";
> + reg = <0x0 0x41000000 0x0 0xF0>;
> + microchip,sync-update = /bits/ 8 <0>;
> + #pwm-cells = <2>;
> + clocks = <&clkcfg CLK_FIC3>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
I'm wondering if these should be grouped under a "fabric" subnode,
like we have an "soc" subnode for on-SoC devices? Rob?
BTW, do you already have a naming plan for different revisions of
FPGA fabric cores?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists