lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15d1b3e8-9bab-6d09-8310-114264e7b324@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Dec 2021 17:04:52 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: fix all kernel-doc warnings



On 12/16/21 17:00, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 04:08:59PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Quieten all kernel-doc warnings in kernel/sched/fair.c:
>>
>> kernel/sched/fair.c:3663: warning: No description found for return value of 'update_cfs_rq_load_avg'
>> kernel/sched/fair.c:8601: warning: No description found for return value of 'asym_smt_can_pull_tasks'
>> kernel/sched/fair.c:8673: warning: Function parameter or member 'sds' not described in 'update_sg_lb_stats'
>> kernel/sched/fair.c:9483: warning: contents before sections
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  kernel/sched/fair.c |    8 +++++---
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- next-2021-1210.orig/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ next-2021-1210/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -3653,7 +3653,7 @@ static inline void add_tg_cfs_propagate(
>>   *
>>   * cfs_rq->avg is used for task_h_load() and update_cfs_share() for example.
>>   *
>> - * Returns true if the load decayed or we removed load.
>> + * Return: true if the load decayed or we removed load.
>>   *
>>   * Since both these conditions indicate a changed cfs_rq->avg.load we should
>>   * call update_tg_load_avg() when this function returns true.
>> @@ -8594,6 +8594,8 @@ group_type group_classify(unsigned int i
>>   *
>>   * If @sg does not have SMT siblings, only pull tasks if all of the SMT siblings
>>   * of @dst_cpu are idle and @sg has lower priority.
>> + *
>> + * Return: true if the load-balancing CPU can pull tasks, false otherwise.
> 
> Can we say "Return: true if @dst_cpu can pull tasks, false otherwise"?
> The load-balancing CPU is not always the same as dst_cpu.

Sure, and thanks for the feedback/correction.

I'll send a v2.

-- 
~Randy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ