linux-kernel - Re: [next] arm64: efi-rt-wrapper.S:8: Error: unknown mnemonic `bti' -- `bti c'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yby20BrmNBtb6tIq@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:12:00 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [next] arm64: efi-rt-wrapper.S:8: Error: unknown mnemonic `bti'
 -- `bti c'

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 03:53:13PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 02:49:30PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > That seems sensible to me, especially given the small number of files
> > affected.  The other thing would be to decide that all assembly files
> > should have the header included by default but that seems like it's
> > invasive and probably disproportionate.

> There's also this:

True, that's even simpler.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)