[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e2518c1-78d0-8103-69ea-40a625259ef8@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 18:07:15 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, broonie@...nel.org,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the kvm tree
On 12/16/21 05:47, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> broonie@...nel.org writes:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 511d25d6b789f ("KVM: PPC: Book3S: Suppress warnings when allocating too big memory slots")
>>
>> from the kvm tree and commits:
>
> That's from the powerpc tree.
>
>> 537a17b314930 ("KVM: Let/force architectures to deal with arch specific memslot data")
>> eaaaed137eccb ("KVM: PPC: Avoid referencing userspace memory region in memslot updates")
>>
>> from the kvm tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Paolo, if you want to avoid the conflict going to Linus, I have that
> commit (and others) in a topic branch here (based on rc2):
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git/log/?h=topic/ppc-kvm
Will pull, thanks!
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists