[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3479378-48bc-23be-d651-3ec52bb0085d@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 11:06:57 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/11] mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing via
FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE (!hugetlb)
On 18.12.21 03:42, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 6:17 PM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> I think the hugepage code should use the exact same logic that the
>> regular wp fault code does.
>
> IOW, I think that this stupid (AND UNTESTED) patch should likely just
> fix David's test-case with the hugepage and splice thing..
>
> Or at least be somewhat close. But it should be paired with the GUP
> side doing the right thing too, of course. Maybe it already does,
> maybe it doesn't, I didn't check...
>
> And maybe there's something subtle about the page_count() of a THP
> entry. Again, I can't really claim to have tested this all, but I'm
> hoping this makes somebody go "Ahh, now I see what Linus means"
Not the reaction you are hoping for: "Gah, Linus still doesn't see why
the page_count is just wrong". :)
See the mail I just wrote, let's get a common understanding of how our
check should actually look like.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists