linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 3/6] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU DT initialization support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211218130014.4037640-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 18 Dec 2021 14:00:11 +0100
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc:     lukasz.luba@....com, robh@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de,
        arnd@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/6] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU DT initialization support

Based on the previous DT changes in the core code, use the 'setup'
callback to initialize the CPU DTPM backend.

Code is reorganized to stick to the DTPM table description. No
functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
index 6bffb44c75aa..ca605911523b 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
 #include <linux/dtpm.h>
 #include <linux/energy_model.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/pm_qos.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/units.h>
@@ -176,6 +177,17 @@ static int cpuhp_dtpm_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 }
 
 static int cpuhp_dtpm_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu;
+
+	dtpm_cpu = per_cpu(dtpm_per_cpu, cpu);
+	if (dtpm_cpu)
+		return dtpm_update_power(&dtpm_cpu->dtpm);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __dtpm_cpu_setup(int cpu, struct dtpm *parent)
 {
 	struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
@@ -183,6 +195,10 @@ static int cpuhp_dtpm_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
 	char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN];
 	int ret = -ENOMEM;
 
+	dtpm_cpu = per_cpu(dtpm_per_cpu, cpu);
+	if (dtpm_cpu)
+		return 0;
+
 	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 	if (!policy)
 		return 0;
@@ -191,10 +207,6 @@ static int cpuhp_dtpm_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
 	if (!pd)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	dtpm_cpu = per_cpu(dtpm_per_cpu, cpu);
-	if (dtpm_cpu)
-		return dtpm_update_power(&dtpm_cpu->dtpm);
-
 	dtpm_cpu = kzalloc(sizeof(*dtpm_cpu), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!dtpm_cpu)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -207,7 +219,7 @@ static int cpuhp_dtpm_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "cpu%d-cpufreq", dtpm_cpu->cpu);
 
-	ret = dtpm_register(name, &dtpm_cpu->dtpm, NULL);
+	ret = dtpm_register(name, &dtpm_cpu->dtpm, parent);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_kfree_dtpm_cpu;
 
@@ -231,7 +243,18 @@ static int cpuhp_dtpm_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int __init dtpm_cpu_init(void)
+static int dtpm_cpu_setup(struct dtpm *dtpm, struct device_node *np)
+{
+	int cpu;
+
+	cpu = of_cpu_node_to_id(np);
+	if (cpu < 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	return __dtpm_cpu_setup(cpu, dtpm);
+}
+
+static int dtpm_cpu_init(void)
 {
 	int ret;
 
@@ -269,4 +292,4 @@ static int __init dtpm_cpu_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-DTPM_DECLARE(dtpm_cpu, dtpm_cpu_init, NULL);
+DTPM_DECLARE(dtpm_cpu, dtpm_cpu_init, dtpm_cpu_setup);
-- 
2.25.1