[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87czlu4bz7.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:17:48 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gustave Monce <gustave.monce@...look.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/patch 0/2] arm64: boot: dts: qcom: sm8150: enable
framebuffer for Surface Duo
Hi Konrad,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org> writes:
> On 17.12.2021 13:57, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...rosoft.com>
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm trying to enable the framebuffer on Microsoft Surface Duo. Looking
>> through some internal docs, it came to my attention that the bootloader
>> will fill up the framebuffer address and size to a memory node names
>> splash_region. Adding the node, I can see the address of the
>> framebuffer. Creating the relevant framebuffer device using
>> simple-framebuffer, I can't see it working. Tried dd if=/dev/urandom
>> of=/dev/fb0 and fb-test. None of which manage to get rid of what's
>> already on the screen, put there by the bootloader (platform Logo).
>>
>> Wondering if any of you have seen a behavior such as this and how did
>> you manage to get framebuffer working on SM8150 (I see at least Sony
>> Xperia has the node).
>>
>> Felipe Balbi (2):
>> arm64: boot: dts: qcom: sm8150: add a label for reserved-memory
>> arm64: boot: dts: qcom: surface duo: add minimal framebuffer
>>
>> .../dts/qcom/sm8150-microsoft-surface-duo.dts | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Hi,
>
>
> this issue is totally unique to the Duo and your bootloader configuration.
>
>
> Gus (CCd, co-author of Lumia 950/XL patches) and I were dissecting
> this precise issue (albeit for a different usecase) and in our testing
> it turned out that XBL likely kills the display stack upon exiting
> Boot Services and jumping to LinuxLoader. This may be a bug that comes
> from the legacy of this device, as exiting Boot Services would be
> rather undesirable in that scenario..
This is very nice background information which I didn't have. Thanks :-)
> One fix would be to ask the bootloader team to look into it and fix it
> from there, otherwise you'd have to bring up the display using the
> DPU1 driver, or perhaps in a third-stage-bootloader (pls don't do it
I'll give DPU1 a shot, thanks for the pointer
> for the sanity of us all :D)
no 3rd stages :-)
--
balbi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists