[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd707dfd-6421-b1df-4820-e30787b84181@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:45:46 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
syzbot <syzbot+643e4ce4b6ad1347d372@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
lkp@...ts.01.org, lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [loop] 322c4293ec: xfstests.xfs.049.fail
On 2021/12/20 0:09, kernel test robot wrote:
> @@ -13,3 +13,5 @@
> --- clean
> --- umount ext2 on xfs
> --- umount xfs
> +!!! umount xfs failed
> +(see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/049.full for details)
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/xfs/049.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/049.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Yes, we know this race condition can happen.
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/16c7d304-60ef-103f-1b2c-8592b48f47c6@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YaYfu0H2k0PSQL6W@infradead.org
Should we try to wait for autoclear operation to complete?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists