linux-kernel - [PATCH v10 08/14] iio: afe: rescale: fix accuracy for small fractional scales

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211219223953.16074-9-liambeguin@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:39:47 -0500
From:   Liam Beguin <liambeguin@...il.com>
To:     liambeguin@...il.com, peda@...ntia.se, jic23@...nel.org,
        lars@...afoo.de
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 08/14] iio: afe: rescale: fix accuracy for small fractional scales

From: Liam Beguin <lvb@...hos.com>

The approximation caused by integer divisions can be costly on smaller
scale values since the decimal part is significant compared to the
integer part. Switch to an IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO scale type in such
cases to maintain accuracy.

Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <lvb@...hos.com>
---
 drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
index e3680998565e..66306477aeab 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int rescale_process_scale(struct rescale *rescale, int scale_type,
 			  int *val, int *val2)
 {
 	s64 tmp;
-	s32 rem;
+	s32 rem, rem2;
 	u32 mult;
 	u32 neg;
 
@@ -42,9 +42,23 @@ int rescale_process_scale(struct rescale *rescale, int scale_type,
 		tmp = (s64)*val * 1000000000LL;
 		tmp = div_s64(tmp, rescale->denominator);
 		tmp *= rescale->numerator;
-		tmp = div_s64(tmp, 1000000000LL);
+
+		tmp = div_s64_rem(tmp, 1000000000LL, &rem);
 		*val = tmp;
-		return scale_type;
+
+		if (!rem)
+			return scale_type;
+
+		tmp = 1 << *val2;
+
+		rem2 = *val % (int)tmp;
+		*val = *val / (int)tmp;
+
+		*val2 = rem / (int)tmp;
+		if (rem2)
+			*val2 += div_s64((s64)rem2 * 1000000000LL, tmp);
+
+		return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO;
 	case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO:
 	case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO:
 		mult = scale_type == IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO ? NANO : MICRO;
-- 
2.34.0