linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched/fair: Do not raise overutilized for idle CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8735mn8abx.mognet@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:17:38 +0000
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        morten.rasmussen@....com, qperret@...gle.com,
        Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched/fair: Do not raise overutilized for idle CPUs

On 20/12/21 12:43, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> During a migration, the lock for the previous runqueue is not taken and
> hence, the task contribution isn't directly removed from that runqueue
> utilization but instead temporarily saved, until the next PELT signals
> update where it would be accounted. There is then a window in which a
> CPU can ben idle be nonetheless overutilized.
>
> The load balancer wouldn't be able to do anything to help a sleeping CPU,
> it brings then no gain to raise overutilized there, only the risk of
> spuriously doing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>
>

Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 51f6f55abb37..37f737c5f0b8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -8641,26 +8641,28 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
>
>               nr_running = rq->nr_running;
>               sgs->sum_nr_running += nr_running;
> -
> -		if (nr_running > 1)
> -			*sg_status |= SG_OVERLOAD;
> -
> -		if (cpu_overutilized(i))
> -			*sg_status |= SG_OVERUTILIZED;
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
>               sgs->nr_numa_running += rq->nr_numa_running;
>               sgs->nr_preferred_running += rq->nr_preferred_running;
>  #endif
> +		if (nr_running > 1)
> +			*sg_status |= SG_OVERLOAD;
> +
>               /*
>                * No need to call idle_cpu() if nr_running is not 0
>                */
>               if (!nr_running && idle_cpu(i)) {
>                       sgs->idle_cpus++;
> -			/* Idle cpu can't have misfit task */
> +			/*
> +			 * Idle cpu can neither be overutilized nor have a
> +			 * misfit task.
> +			 */
>                       continue;
>               }
>
> +		if (cpu_overutilized(i))
> +			*sg_status |= SG_OVERUTILIZED;
> +
>               if (local_group)
>                       continue;
>
> --
> 2.25.1