[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211220195646.44498-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 19:56:36 +0000
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
etienne.carriere@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
souvik.chakravarty@....com, cristian.marussi@....com
Subject: [PATCH v8 01/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add configurable polling mode for transports
SCMI communications along TX channels can optionally be provided of a
completion interrupt; when such interrupt is not available, command
transactions should rely on polling, where the SCMI core takes care to
repeatedly evaluate the transport-specific .poll_done() function, if
available, to determine if and when a request was fully completed or
timed out.
Such mechanism is already present and working on a single transfer base:
SCMI protocols can indeed enable hdr.poll_completion on specific commands
ahead of each transfer and cause that transaction to be handled with
polling.
Introduce a couple of flags to be able to enforce such polling behaviour
globally at will:
- scmi_desc.force_polling: to statically switch the whole transport to
polling mode.
- scmi_chan_info.no_completion_irq: to switch a single channel dynamically
to polling mode if, at runtime, is determined that no completion
interrupt was available for such channel.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
---
v7 --> v8
- removed internal poling_enabled flag, using macros
v5 --> v6
- removed check on replies received by IRQs when xfer was requested
as poll_completion (not all transport can suppress IRQs on an xfer basis)
v4 --> v5
- make force_polling const
- introduce polling_enabled flag to simplify checks on do_xfer
v3 --> v4:
- renamed .needs_polling flag to .no_completion_irq
- refactored error path when polling needed but not supported
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 8 ++++++++
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
index 6438b5248c24..652e5d95ee65 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
@@ -339,11 +339,16 @@ void scmi_protocol_release(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol_id);
* @dev: Reference to device in the SCMI hierarchy corresponding to this
* channel
* @handle: Pointer to SCMI entity handle
+ * @no_completion_irq: Flag to indicate that this channel has no completion
+ * interrupt mechanism for synchronous commands.
+ * This can be dynamically set by transports at run-time
+ * inside their provided .chan_setup().
* @transport_info: Transport layer related information
*/
struct scmi_chan_info {
struct device *dev;
struct scmi_handle *handle;
+ bool no_completion_irq;
void *transport_info;
};
@@ -402,6 +407,8 @@ struct scmi_device *scmi_child_dev_find(struct device *parent,
* be pending simultaneously in the system. May be overridden by the
* get_max_msg op.
* @max_msg_size: Maximum size of data per message that can be handled.
+ * @force_polling: Flag to force this whole transport to use SCMI core polling
+ * mechanism instead of completion interrupts even if available.
*/
struct scmi_desc {
int (*transport_init)(void);
@@ -410,6 +417,7 @@ struct scmi_desc {
int max_rx_timeout_ms;
int max_msg;
int max_msg_size;
+ const bool force_polling;
};
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_MAILBOX
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index 476b91845e40..cb9fc12503f2 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -36,6 +36,23 @@
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/scmi.h>
+#define IS_POLLING_REQUIRED(__c, __i) \
+ ((__c)->no_completion_irq || (__i)->desc->force_polling) \
+
+#define IS_TRANSPORT_POLLING_CAPABLE(__i) \
+ ((__i)->desc->ops->poll_done)
+
+#define IS_POLLING_ENABLED(__c, __i) \
+({ \
+ bool __ret; \
+ typeof(__c) c_ = __c; \
+ typeof(__i) i_ = __i; \
+ \
+ __ret = (IS_POLLING_REQUIRED(c_, i_) && \
+ IS_TRANSPORT_POLLING_CAPABLE(i_)); \
+ __ret; \
+})
+
enum scmi_error_codes {
SCMI_SUCCESS = 0, /* Success */
SCMI_ERR_SUPPORT = -1, /* Not supported */
@@ -817,6 +834,7 @@ static int do_xfer(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
struct device *dev = info->dev;
struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo;
+ /* Check for polling request on custom command xfers at first */
if (xfer->hdr.poll_completion && !info->desc->ops->poll_done) {
dev_warn_once(dev,
"Polling mode is not supported by transport.\n");
@@ -827,6 +845,10 @@ static int do_xfer(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
if (unlikely(!cinfo))
return -EINVAL;
+ /* True ONLY if also supported by transport. */
+ if (IS_POLLING_ENABLED(cinfo, info))
+ xfer->hdr.poll_completion = true;
+
/*
* Initialise protocol id now from protocol handle to avoid it being
* overridden by mistake (or malice) by the protocol code mangling with
@@ -1527,6 +1549,16 @@ static int scmi_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info, struct device *dev,
if (ret)
return ret;
+ if (tx && IS_POLLING_REQUIRED(cinfo, info)) {
+ if (IS_TRANSPORT_POLLING_CAPABLE(info))
+ dev_info(dev,
+ "Enabled polling mode TX channel - prot_id:%d\n",
+ prot_id);
+ else
+ dev_warn(dev,
+ "Polling mode NOT supported by transport.\n");
+ }
+
idr_alloc:
ret = idr_alloc(idr, cinfo, prot_id, prot_id + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret != prot_id) {
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists