[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07781322-3632-7d63-0da8-a651a438a3ff@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:05:28 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@...omium.org>,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 1/7] usb: misc: Add onboard_usb_hub driver
16.11.2021 23:07, Matthias Kaehlcke пишет:
> +static const struct usb_device_id onboard_hub_id_table[] = {
> + { USB_DEVICE(VENDOR_ID_REALTEK, 0x0411) }, /* RTS0411 USB 3.0 */
> + { USB_DEVICE(VENDOR_ID_REALTEK, 0x5411) }, /* RTS5411 USB 2.0 */
> + {},
> +};
RTS5411 two times in the comments? Internet suggests that RTS5411 is USB 3.0
Are these hubs expected to be powered-on only when upstream port is
enabled? Shouldn't runtime PM be used for that somehow?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists