lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <HTKF4R.5S1PY4MCM4QS@ixit.cz>
Date:   Mon, 20 Dec 2021 21:27:17 +0100
From:   David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
Subject: Question about node naming in [PATCH v3 13/18] ARM: dts: qcom: sdx55:
 Add spmi node

Hello Manivannan,

I'd like to ask, if you had any particular reason to name node 
`qcom,spmi@` instead of basic `spmi@`.

I'm currently converting binding for 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb and I'm 
considering adding qcom,spmi into qcom,spmi-pmic-arb or just rename 
this and arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi `qcom,spmi@` occurences 
to `spmi@`.

Ideas, inputs?

Thank you
David


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ