[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <HTKF4R.5S1PY4MCM4QS@ixit.cz>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 21:27:17 +0100
From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
Subject: Question about node naming in [PATCH v3 13/18] ARM: dts: qcom: sdx55:
Add spmi node
Hello Manivannan,
I'd like to ask, if you had any particular reason to name node
`qcom,spmi@` instead of basic `spmi@`.
I'm currently converting binding for
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb and I'm
considering adding qcom,spmi into qcom,spmi-pmic-arb or just rename
this and arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi `qcom,spmi@` occurences
to `spmi@`.
Ideas, inputs?
Thank you
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists