[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164003345302.532019.10882095301451527257.b4-ty@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 13:50:53 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>,
"open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] blktrace: switch trace spinlock to a raw spinlock
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 16:28:27 -0300, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
> The running_trace_lock protects running_trace_list and is acquired
> within the tracepoint which implies disabled preemption. The spinlock_t
> typed lock can not be acquired with disabled preemption on PREEMPT_RT
> because it becomes a sleeping lock.
> The runtime of the tracepoint depends on the number of entries in
> running_trace_list and has no limit. The blk-tracer is considered debug
> code and higher latencies here are okay.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] blktrace: switch trace spinlock to a raw spinlock
commit: 361c81dbc58c8aa230e1f2d556045fa7bc3eb4a3
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists