lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcDvTMUF3XWKWgSW@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Dec 2021 21:02:04 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/11] mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing via
 FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE (!hugetlb)

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:15:14AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Well, that patch seems to be a no-op removal of dead code, so absolutely yes.
> 
> That said, I think it would be good to split it up. I looked at that
> patch and went "is that really a no-op" to the point of recreating it.
> 
> I think it would be good to make it multiple patches that are each
> individally trivial. IOW, start with
> 
>  (1) remove second argument to reuse_swap_page() that is always NULL,
> without making any other changes
> 
>  (2) that now made 'total_mapcount' unused in reuse_swap_page(),
> remove it as an argument from page_trans_huge_map_swapcount()
> 
>  (3) that now made 'total_mapcount' unused in
> page_trans_huge_mapcount(), remove it as an argument there too.

Hah, that was actually how I did it originally (without actually
committing at each step, and with a few "Oh, hang on, now we can avoid
calculating this too" stops and restarts along the way), but I thought
it all hung together logically as a single change.  It's hard to see
things from the other person's perspective at times.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ