[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec9eddf5-aba2-d63b-0e39-1a3d5bda3ce9@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 16:14:29 +0530
From: "Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)" <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <swboyd@...omium.org>,
<collinsd@...eaurora.org>, <subbaram@...eaurora.org>,
Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/6] regulator: Add a regulator driver for the PM8008
PMIC
On 12/6/2021 8:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 08:13:57PM +0530, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
>> On 11/25/2021 9:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:12:31PM +0530, Satya Priya wrote:
>>>> + child_node = of_get_child_by_name(parent_node, reg->name);
>>>> + if (!child_node) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "child node %s not found\n", reg->name);
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> + }
>>> This could be pulled out of the array.
>> Not sure what you meant here. could you elaborate a bit?
> Why is this in every iteration of the loop?
Getting the child node here is not required anymore. This got carried
from previous versions, I'll remove this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists