linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 29/31] xen/console: harden hvc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211220143020.903979196@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:34:29 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 29/31] xen/console: harden hvc_xen against event channel storms

From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>

commit fe415186b43df0db1f17fa3a46275fd92107fe71 upstream.

The Xen console driver is still vulnerable for an attack via excessive
number of events sent by the backend. Fix that by using a lateeoi event
channel.

For the normal domU initial console this requires the introduction of
bind_evtchn_to_irq_lateeoi() as there is no xenbus device available
at the time the event channel is bound to the irq.

As the decision whether an interrupt was spurious or not requires to
test for bytes having been read from the backend, move sending the
event into the if statement, as sending an event without having found
any bytes to be read is making no sense at all.

This is part of XSA-391

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
@@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ struct xencons_info {
 	struct xenbus_device *xbdev;
 	struct xencons_interface *intf;
 	unsigned int evtchn;
+	XENCONS_RING_IDX out_cons;
+	unsigned int out_cons_same;
 	struct hvc_struct *hvc;
 	int irq;
 	int vtermno;
@@ -151,6 +153,8 @@ static int domU_read_console(uint32_t vt
 	XENCONS_RING_IDX cons, prod;
 	int recv = 0;
 	struct xencons_info *xencons = vtermno_to_xencons(vtermno);
+	unsigned int eoiflag = 0;
+
 	if (xencons == NULL)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	intf = xencons->intf;
@@ -170,7 +174,27 @@ static int domU_read_console(uint32_t vt
 	mb();			/* read ring before consuming */
 	intf->in_cons = cons;
 
-	notify_daemon(xencons);
+	/*
+	 * When to mark interrupt having been spurious:
+	 * - there was no new data to be read, and
+	 * - the backend did not consume some output bytes, and
+	 * - the previous round with no read data didn't see consumed bytes
+	 *   (we might have a race with an interrupt being in flight while
+	 *   updating xencons->out_cons, so account for that by allowing one
+	 *   round without any visible reason)
+	 */
+	if (intf->out_cons != xencons->out_cons) {
+		xencons->out_cons = intf->out_cons;
+		xencons->out_cons_same = 0;
+	}
+	if (recv) {
+		notify_daemon(xencons);
+	} else if (xencons->out_cons_same++ > 1) {
+		eoiflag = XEN_EOI_FLAG_SPURIOUS;
+	}
+
+	xen_irq_lateeoi(xencons->irq, eoiflag);
+
 	return recv;
 }
 
@@ -399,7 +423,7 @@ static int xencons_connect_backend(struc
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 	info->evtchn = evtchn;
-	irq = bind_evtchn_to_irq(evtchn);
+	irq = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irq_lateeoi(dev->otherend_id, evtchn);
 	if (irq < 0)
 		return irq;
 	info->irq = irq;
@@ -563,7 +587,7 @@ static int __init xen_hvc_init(void)
 			return r;
 
 		info = vtermno_to_xencons(HVC_COOKIE);
-		info->irq = bind_evtchn_to_irq(info->evtchn);
+		info->irq = bind_evtchn_to_irq_lateeoi(info->evtchn);
 	}
 	if (info->irq < 0)
 		info->irq = 0; /* NO_IRQ */