[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFr9PXkkp8B5Vv0eu+2gPF2S4CNaxZDwjPg+UXRgvyUkAZBFpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:02:04 +0900
From: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] gpio: msc313: Add support for SSD201 and SSD202D
Hi Bartosz,
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 23:50, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:40 AM Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com> wrote:
> >
> > This adds GPIO support for the SSD201 and SSD202D chips.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > ---
>
> I applied patches 1-3. This triggers a bunch of checkpatch errors.
> Please address them and resend this single patch.
The warnings about complex macros being wrapped in parentheses when
the things it's complaining about are defined lists not macros?
Not going to say I know better than checkpatch but I think the errors
there are wrong. Putting parentheses around the lists would break the
arrays they get put into.
Cheers,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists