[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0-ZOwoC_Ft+TiKAXdETcqU5XPS+9DZGkA+bB73SNCCbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:21:02 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
liush <liush@...winnertech.com>, wefu@...hat.com,
Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>, wangjunqiang@...as.ac.cn,
Wei Wu (吴伟) <lazyparser@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] riscv: compat: Add COMPAT Kbuild skeletal support
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 5:35 PM <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> +
> +config SYSVIPC_COMPAT
> + def_bool y
> + depends on COMPAT && SYSVIPC
Can this be moved to init/Kconfig next to SYSVIPC?
> +
> +COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE0(rt_sigreturn)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
This confused me a bit while reviewing, would it make sense to reorder the
patches to add the three missing functions first instead of adding the
dummy and then replacing it?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists