linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/13] riscv: compat: Add COMPAT Kbuild skeletal support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:21:02 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
        gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        liush <liush@...winnertech.com>, wefu@...hat.com,
        Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>, wangjunqiang@...as.ac.cn,
        Wei Wu (吴伟) <lazyparser@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] riscv: compat: Add COMPAT Kbuild skeletal support

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 5:35 PM <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> +
> +config SYSVIPC_COMPAT
> +       def_bool y
> +       depends on COMPAT && SYSVIPC

Can this be moved to init/Kconfig next to SYSVIPC?

> +
> +COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE0(rt_sigreturn)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}

This confused me a bit while reviewing, would it make sense to reorder the
patches to add the three missing functions first instead of adding the
dummy and then replacing it?


        Arnd