[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d4f20da-f18b-eccf-19c4-ea7c15492634@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:49:38 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: mario.limonciello@....com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
dianders@...omium.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] HID: i2c-hid-acpi: Remove explicit
device_set_wakeup_capable
Hi,
On 12/21/21 00:43, Raul E Rangel wrote:
> The ACPI subsystem is responsible for managing the power and wake
> sources for an ACPI device. By explicitly calling
> device_set_wakeup_capable, we are circumvent the ACPI subsystem and
> setting wake capabilities on the device when it doesn't support it.
>
> Take the following example:
> * We have an ACPI HID device that has `_PR0` and `_PR3`. It doesn't have
> `_PRW` so that means the device can't wake the system.
> * The IRQ line is active level low for this device and is pulled up by the
> power resource defined in `_PR0`/`_PR3`.
>
> Since the i2c-hid driver has set the device as wake capable, the wake
> pin gets enabled on suspend.
The IRQ pin should only have a enable_irq_wake() called on it if
something has actually requested the i2c-HID device to be a wakeup source,
the removed code claims the device is wakeup *capable*, but is also
explicitly calls device_set_wakeup_enable(dev, false), disabling wakeup.
And i2c-hid suspend does:
if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev)) {
wake_status = enable_irq_wake(client->irq);
And device_may_wakeup() checks the wakeup *enabled* setting AFAIK.
I've added Rafael to the Cc since he knows all this a lot better then me.
I have the feeling that your userspace is perhaps poking the
wakeup settings in sysfs, triggering this issue.
> As part of suspend, ACPI will power down
> the device since it's not a wake source. When the device is powered
> down, the IRQ line will drop, and it will trigger a wake event.
To me that sounds like the device is not wakeup *capable* at all, so
its ACPI node should not set the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag at all.
Note I'm not certain about this at all, but at a first look this feels
like it is not the right fix for your problem.
Regards,
Hans
>
> See the following debug log:
> [ 42.335804] PM: Suspending system (s2idle)
> [ 42.340186] amd_gpio AMD0030:00: RX: Setting wake for pin 89 to enable
> [ 42.467736] power-0416 __acpi_power_off : Power resource [PR00] turned off
> [ 42.467739] device_pm-0280 device_set_power : Device [H05D] transitioned to D3cold
> [ 42.475210] PM: pm_system_irq_wakeup: 11 triggered pinctrl_amd
> [ 42.535293] PM: Wakeup unrelated to ACPI SCI
> [ 42.535294] PM: resume from suspend-to-idle
>
> Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c
> index a6f0257a26de..fc311a19a19d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c
> @@ -105,11 +105,6 @@ static int i2c_hid_acpi_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> acpi_device_fix_up_power(adev);
>
> - if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0) {
> - device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);
> - device_set_wakeup_enable(dev, false);
> - }
> -
> return i2c_hid_core_probe(client, &ihid_acpi->ops,
> hid_descriptor_address);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists