[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfWqV8UFWLaJO7JSo7N6MhYVMWdquMDJU7xR5gu8604AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 20:13:30 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..."
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-unisoc@...ts.infradead.org,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: Remove unused local OF node pointers
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 4:11 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 5:09 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 2:24 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > After the commit 448cf90513d9 ("gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node
> > > assignment in the drivers") the OF node local pointers become unused.
> > > Remove them for good and make compiler happy about.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 448cf90513d9 ("gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers")
> > > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>
> ...
>
> > > - gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", dev->of_node);
> > > + gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> >
> > This is unrelated though. Can you make it a separate patch?
>
> It actually makes use of the local np IIRC.
> It's related, no?
No, the np pointer is already used elsewhere. You just replace the
dev->of_node here with np. Rightfully so, but it's not part of this
commit logically.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists