lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcI7oGVjwQA4+5uc@debianG>
Date:   Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:40:00 -0300
From:   Gaston Gonzalez <gascoar@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, nsaenz@...nel.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, rjui@...adcom.com, sbranden@...adcom.com,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        juerg.haefliger@...onical.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com, stefan.wahren@...e.com,
        unixbhaskar@...il.com, mitaliborkar810@...il.com,
        phil@...pberrypi.com, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gascoar@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] staging: vc04_services: avoid the use of typedef for
 function pointers

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 07:20:36AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 06:29:10PM -0300, Gaston Gonzalez wrote:
> > This patch set removes some typedefs for function pointers in vc04_services.
> > 
> > After patches 01 to 03, there are no remaining typedef under vc04_services.
> > Hence, the patch 04/04 updates the TODO file removing the 'remove typedefs'
> > task.
> > 
> > Gaston Gonzalez (4):
> >   staging: bcm2835-audio: replace function typedefs with equivalent
> >     declaration
> >   staging: vc04_services: replace function typedef with equivalent
> >     declaration
> >   staging: vc04_services: avoid the use of typedef for function pointers
> >   staging: vc04_services: update TODO file
> 
> These are not the name of the patches that you sent out at all :(
> 
> Are you sure you created this properly?
> 
> Something went wrong.
> 
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

I'm sorry, I messed up editing the subjects using git send-email
directly. I didn't realized that that would create a mismatch with the
summary in patch 0/4. It is clear now ...

thanks,

Gaston

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ