[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f104044649ec60ba93648e68c3df2183e032072.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:48:26 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel@...s.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: virtio_uml: allow probing from devicetree
On Tue, 2021-12-21 at 10:04 +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> Allow the virtio_uml device to be probed from the devicetree so that
> sub-devices can be specified using the standard virtio bindings, for
> example:
>
> virtio@1 {
> compatible = "virtio,uml";
> socket-path = "i2c.sock";
> virtio-device-id = <0x22>;
>
Given this, maybe it should modify
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/virtio-device.yaml? Or actually
add a new Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/uml.yaml I guess?
+Rob, because I'm not really into any of this.
Also, I'm not even sure we should/need to document the DT bits that are
basically only used for testing in the first place?
Code looks good to me.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists