[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1202521211.191037.1640120703350.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 22:05:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: hch <hch@....de>
Cc: anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: remove set_fs for UML
Christoph,
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "hch" <hch@....de>
> An: "richard" <richard@....at>, "anton ivanov" <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
> CC: "x86" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-um" <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2021 17:56:10
> Betreff: remove set_fs for UML
> Hi Richard and Anton,
>
> this series removes address space overrides using set_fs for UML.
>
> Diffstat:
> um/Kconfig | 1 -
> um/include/asm/thread_info.h | 4 ----
> um/include/asm/uaccess.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> um/kernel/skas/uaccess.c | 25 -------------------------
> x86/include/asm/mtrr.h | 8 +-------
> x86/kernel/setup.c | 7 ++++++-
> x86/um/asm/segment.h | 8 --------
> 7 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
So far UML seems to work with these changes applied. :-)
I have applied both patches to my UML tree for now, I assume x86 maintainers are fine with
patch 1/2?
Thanks.
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists