[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfc25b22-2f66-4404-66c4-44c9c8c3bab4@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:41:32 +0800
From: cuigaosheng <cuigaosheng1@...wei.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<gongruiqi1@...wei.com>, <wangweiyang2@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] replace open coded VA->PA calculation
> I could apply them directly with the maintainer Acks, but I don't understand
> the significance of you sending them now. Is something broken without the
> three patches? Are these the only ones missing from Ard's original series,
> or is this preparation? Would you expect the patches to get backported to
> stable kernels?
Thanks for your reply.
This is preparation work for arm32 kaslr,and I want to continue to improve
the solution based on the work of Ard. These patches are relatively
independent, so I submit these patches first.
Gaosheng.
在 2021/12/20 23:39, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 9:58 AM Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@...wei.com> wrote:
>> These patches replace an open coded calculation to obtain the physical
>> address of a far symbol with a call to the new ldr_l etc macro, and they
>> belong to the kaslr patch set of arm32.
>>
>> Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/?h=arm-kaslr-latest
>>
>> Ard Biesheuvel (3):
>> arm-soc: exynos: replace open coded VA->PA conversions
>> arm-soc: mvebu: replace open coded VA->PA conversion
>> arm-soc: various: replace open coded VA->PA calculation
> Usually these patches should go through the respective platform
> maintainer trees,
> and from there into the soc tree, but time is a little short here.
>
> I could apply them directly with the maintainer Acks, but I don't understand
> the significance of you sending them now. Is something broken without the
> three patches? Are these the only ones missing from Ard's original series,
> or is this preparation? Would you expect the patches to get backported to
> stable kernels?
>
> Arnd
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists