lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfc25b22-2f66-4404-66c4-44c9c8c3bab4@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:41:32 +0800
From:   cuigaosheng <cuigaosheng1@...wei.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
        SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <gongruiqi1@...wei.com>, <wangweiyang2@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] replace open coded VA->PA calculation

> I could apply them directly with the maintainer Acks, but I don't understand
> the significance of you sending them now. Is something broken without the
> three patches? Are these the only ones missing from Ard's original series,
> or is this preparation? Would you expect the patches to get backported to
> stable kernels?

Thanks for your reply.

This is preparation work for arm32 kaslr,and I want to continue to improve
the solution based on the work of Ard. These patches are relatively
independent, so I submit these patches first.

Gaosheng.

在 2021/12/20 23:39, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 9:58 AM Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@...wei.com> wrote:
>> These patches replace an open coded calculation to obtain the physical
>> address of a far symbol with a call to the new ldr_l etc macro, and they
>> belong to the kaslr patch set of arm32.
>>
>> Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/?h=arm-kaslr-latest
>>
>> Ard Biesheuvel (3):
>>    arm-soc: exynos: replace open coded VA->PA conversions
>>    arm-soc: mvebu: replace open coded VA->PA conversion
>>    arm-soc: various: replace open coded VA->PA calculation
> Usually these patches should go through the respective platform
> maintainer trees,
> and from there into the soc tree, but time is a little short here.
>
> I could apply them directly with the maintainer Acks, but I don't understand
> the significance of you sending them now. Is something broken without the
> three patches? Are these the only ones missing from Ard's original series,
> or is this preparation? Would you expect the patches to get backported to
> stable kernels?
>
>         Arnd
> .

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ