linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/18] MM: Add AS_CAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YcGUWxqQts79Kv6B@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:46:19 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:     Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/18] MM: Add AS_CAN_DIO mapping flag

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:48:23AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> Currently various places test if direct IO is possible on a file by
> checking for the existence of the direct_IO address space operation.
> This is a poor choice, as the direct_IO operation may not be used - it is
> only used if the generic_file_*_iter functions are called for direct IO
> and some filesystems - particularly NFS - don't do this.
> 
> Instead, introduce a new mapping flag: AS_CAN_DIO and change the various
> places to check this (avoiding a pointer dereference).
> unlock_new_inode() will set this flag if ->direct_IO is present, so
> filesystems do not need to be changed.
> 
> NFS *is* changed, to set the flag explicitly and discard the direct_IO
> entry in the address_space_operations for files.

For other can flags related to file operations we usuall stash them into
file->f_mode.  Any reason to treat this different?