[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcGXwQ63DFzdpSoj@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:00:49 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Divya Koppera <Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com>
Cc: hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: micrel: Adding interrupt support for
Link up/Link down in LAN8814 Quad phy
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 12:35:02PM +0530, Divya Koppera wrote:
> This patch add support for Link up or Link down
> interrupt support in LAN8814 Quad phy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Divya Koppera <Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> index 44a24b99c894..46931020ef84 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,23 @@
> #define KSZ8081_LMD_SHORT_INDICATOR BIT(12)
> #define KSZ8081_LMD_DELTA_TIME_MASK GENMASK(8, 0)
>
> +/* Lan8814 general Interrupt control/status reg in GPHY specific block. */
> +#define LAN8814_INTC 0x18
> +#define LAN8814_INTC_LINK_DOWN BIT(2)
> +#define LAN8814_INTC_LINK_UP BIT(0)
> +#define LAN8814_INTC_LINK (LAN8814_INTC_LINK_UP |\
> + LAN8814_INTC_LINK_DOWN)
> +
> +#define LAN8814_INTS 0x1B
> +#define LAN8814_INTS_LINK_DOWN BIT(2)
> +#define LAN8814_INTS_LINK_UP BIT(0)
> +#define LAN8814_INTS_LINK (LAN8814_INTS_LINK_UP |\
I've never seen an interrupt controller where the interrupt control
bits and the interrupt status bits are different. So just define the
two interesting bits as LAN8814_INT_LINK_DOWN and LAN8814_INT_LINK_UP
and share them across the two registers.
Otherwise this looks good.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists