[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcGakjioHqAFpLlE@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:12:50 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@...labora.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Menzel <pm.debian@...glemail.com>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware: Update Kconfig help text for Google firmware
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 02:08:51PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:55:40PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > The help text for GOOGLE_FIRMWARE states that it should only be
> > enabled when building a kernel for Google's own servers. However,
> > many of the drivers dependent on it are also useful on Chromebooks or
> > on any platform using coreboot.
> >
> > Update the help text to reflect this double duty.
> >
> > Fixes: d384d6f43d1e ("firmware: google memconsole: Add coreboot support")
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> > ---
> > v2: Mention coreboot, and don't touch GSMI help text
> >
> > drivers/firmware/google/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/google/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/google/Kconfig
> > index f16b381a569c..ca049ecf5cfd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/google/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/google/Kconfig
> > @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ menuconfig GOOGLE_FIRMWARE
> > bool "Google Firmware Drivers"
> > default n
> > help
> > - These firmware drivers are used by Google's servers. They are
> > - only useful if you are working directly on one of their
> > - proprietary servers. If in doubt, say "N".
> > + These firmware drivers are used by Google servers,
> > + Chromebooks and other devices using coreboot firmware.
> > + If in doubt, say "N".
> >
> > if GOOGLE_FIRMWARE
>
> Prompted by a question downstream in Debian it looks that this patch
> never go applied.
>
> Is there anything missing for having it applied?
>
> Do you want a fresh resent of it?
I've picked it up now, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists