linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: selftests: Add EXTRA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAhSdy3qFZoK16gh=F5jk7QC3q_xMOJbCmigCsQ1d7WYoSR9nA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Dec 2021 14:48:01 +0530
From:   Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        KVM General <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: selftests: Add EXTRA_CFLAGS in top-level Makefile

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 1:15 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021, Anup Patel wrote:
> > We add EXTRA_CFLAGS to the common CFLAGS of top-level Makefile
>
> Nit, wrap closer to 75 chars.

Okay, I will update.

>
> > which will allow users to pass additional compile-time flags such
> > as "-static".
>
> In case there's any hesitation in applying this (Paolo asked if this was just for
> debugging in v1), being able to pass "-static" is helpful for our environment as
> our test systems have a funky and minimal configuration (no gcc, and the interpreter
> is in a weird location).  Running selftests either requires building them with
> -static or creating a symbolic link for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2.  It's generally
> easier to just tell people to compile with -static.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>

Thanks, I am planning to queue this for 5.17. Currently, I am waiting for
some reviews on the PATCH4 (last patch).

Regards,
Anup