[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcGeKpy/oecKlKZg@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:28:10 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/34] component: Introduce struct aggregate_device
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 02:26:59PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Replace 'struct master' with 'struct aggregate_device' and then rename
> 'master' to 'adev' everywhere in the code. While we're here, put a
> struct device inside the aggregate device so that we can register it
> with a bus_type in the next patch.
Do not do a "while we are here" type change please. Do the
rename/replace first, and then make the other change.
> The diff is large but that's because this is mostly a rename, where
> sometimes 'master' is replaced with 'adev' and other times it is
> replaced with 'parent' to indicate that the struct device that was being
> used is actually the parent of the aggregate device and driver.
The diff is 15 lines, how is that "large"?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists