[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcGhWRPSbxNC4Qn9@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:41:45 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: earlyprintk=xdbc seems broken
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:40:50AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> index 2e076a459a0c..cd8b5cac542a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -1485,6 +1485,7 @@ void __init tsc_early_init(void)
> loops_per_jiffy = get_loops_per_jiffy();
>
> tsc_enable_sched_clock();
> + use_tsc_delay();
> }
>
> void __init tsc_init(void)
Thomas, the above hunk seems right to me; should I make a proper patch
ouf of that or did I overlook something obvious ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists