[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpqJ-tWmb5Ba6XSK59toCtLb3nRRmVH8da4Ud_rrRYytmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 13:50:06 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
Cc: robdclark@...il.com, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
sean@...rly.run, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
tzimmermann@...e.de, maxime@...no.tech, mripard@...nel.org,
wens@...e.org, jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add missing format_mod_supported functions
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 13:13, José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> When setting IN_FORMATS, implementing the
> "drm_plane_funcs.format_mod_supported" function is mandatory to avoid
> exposing a bogus blob.
>
> This patchset adds a bit of documentation and fixes the issue in a
> couple of drivers affected by the bug.
>
> I reviewed all the other drivers and I didn't find more instances of
> the issue.
>
> Jose
>
> José Expósito (3):
> drm/plane: Mention format_mod_supported in IN_FORMATS docs
> drm/msm/mdp4: Add format_mod_supported function
> drm/sun4i: Add format_mod_supported function
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c | 7 +++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_plane.c | 8 ++++++++
You missed mdp5_plane.c here. But I assume that the proposed fix is
not correct, see my comments on patch 1.
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_ui_layer.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_vi_layer.c | 7 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists