lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Dec 2021 22:32:24 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, ziy@...dia.com, shy828301@...il.com,
        zhongjiang-ali@...ux.alibaba.com, xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add a new scheme to support demotion on tiered memory
 system



On 12/21/2021 9:26 PM, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hi Baolin,
> 
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:18:02 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now on tiered memory system with different memory types, the reclaim path in
>> shrink_page_list() already support demoting pages to slow memory node instead
>> of discarding the pages. However, at that time the fast memory node memory
>> wartermark is already tense, which will increase the memory allocation latency
>> during page demotion. So a new method from user space demoting cold pages
>> proactively will be more helpful.
>>
>> We can rely on the DAMON in user space to help to monitor the cold memory on
>> fast memory node, and demote the cold pages to slow memory node proactively to
>> keep the fast memory node in a healthy state.
>>
>> This patch set introduces a new scheme named DAMOS_DEMOTE to support this feature,
>> and works well from my testing. Any comments are welcome. Thanks.
> 
> I like the idea, thank you for these patches!  If possible, could you share
> some details about your tests?

Sure, sorry for not adding more information about my tests.

My machine contains 64G DRAM + 256G AEP(persistent memory), and you 
should enable the demotion firstly by:
echo "true" > /sys/kernel/mm/numa/demotion_enabled

Then I just write a simple test case like below to mmap some anon 
memory, and then just read and write half of the mmap buffer to let 
another half to be cold enough to demote.

int main()
{
         int len = 50 * 1024 * 1024;
         int scan_len = len / 2;
         int i, ret, j;
         unsigned long *p;

         p = mmap(NULL, len, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
                  MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
         if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
                 printf("failed to get memory\n");
                 return -1;
         }

         for (i = 0; i < len / sizeof(*p); i++)
                 p[i] = 0x55aa;

         /* Let another half of buffer to be cold */
         do {
                 for (i = 0; i < scan_len / sizeof(*p); i++)
                         p[i] = 0x55aa;

                 sleep(2);

                 for (i = 0; i < scan_len / sizeof(*p); i++)
                         j +=  p[i] >> 2;
         } while (1);

         munmap(p, len);
         return 0;
}

After setting the atts/schemes/target_ids, then start monitoring:
echo 100000 1000000 1000000 10 1000 > /sys/kernel/debug/damon/attrs
echo 4096 8192000 0 5 10 2000 5 1000 2097152 5000 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 > 
/sys/kernel/debug/damon/schemes

After a while, you can check the demote statictics by below command, and 
you can find the demote scheme is applied by demoting some cold pages to 
slow memory (AEP) node.

cat /proc/vmstat | grep "demote"
pgdemote_direct 6881

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ