| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YcHtZbTQ7B64Py+7@krava>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 16:06:13 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Truong <alexandre.truong@....com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] perf arm64: inject missing frames if perf-record
used "--call-graph=fp"
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 11:17:03AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:32:50AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 03:45:20PM +0000, German Gomez wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +u64 get_leaf_frame_caller_aarch64(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread, int usr_idx)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret;
> > > + struct entries entries = {};
> > > + struct regs_dump old_regs = sample->user_regs;
> > > +
> > > + if (!get_leaf_frame_caller_enabled(sample))
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * If PC and SP are not recorded, get the value of PC from the stack
> > > + * and set its mask. SP is not used when doing the unwinding but it
> > > + * still needs to be set to prevent failures.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > + if (!(sample->user_regs.mask & SMPL_REG_MASK(PERF_REG_ARM64_PC))) {
> > > + sample->user_regs.cache_mask |= SMPL_REG_MASK(PERF_REG_ARM64_PC);
> > > + sample->user_regs.cache_regs[PERF_REG_ARM64_PC] = sample->callchain->ips[usr_idx+1];
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (!(sample->user_regs.mask & SMPL_REG_MASK(PERF_REG_ARM64_SP))) {
> > > + sample->user_regs.cache_mask |= SMPL_REG_MASK(PERF_REG_ARM64_SP);
> > > + sample->user_regs.cache_regs[PERF_REG_ARM64_SP] = 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = unwind__get_entries(add_entry, &entries, thread, sample, 2);
> >
> > just curious, did you try this with both unwinders libunwind/libdw?
> >
> > any chance you could add arm specific test for this?
> >
> > otherwise it looks good to me
>
> Whole patchkit?
yes, it's for the patchset
jirka
>
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> >
> > thanks,
> > jirka
> >
> >
> > > + sample->user_regs = old_regs;
> > > +
> > > + if (ret || entries.length != 2)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + return callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLER ? entries.stack[0] : entries.stack[1];
> > > +}
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm64-frame-pointer-unwind-support.h b/tools/perf/util/arm64-frame-pointer-unwind-support.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..32af9ce94398
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm64-frame-pointer-unwind-support.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > > +#ifndef __PERF_ARM_FRAME_POINTER_UNWIND_SUPPORT_H
> > > +#define __PERF_ARM_FRAME_POINTER_UNWIND_SUPPORT_H
> > > +
> > > +#include "event.h"
> > > +#include "thread.h"
> > > +
> > > +u64 get_leaf_frame_caller_aarch64(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread, int user_idx);
> > > +
> > > +#endif /* __PERF_ARM_FRAME_POINTER_UNWIND_SUPPORT_H */
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> > > index 3eddad009f78..a00fd6796b35 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> > > #include "bpf-event.h"
> > > #include <internal/lib.h> // page_size
> > > #include "cgroup.h"
> > > +#include "arm64-frame-pointer-unwind-support.h"
> > >
> > > #include <linux/ctype.h>
> > > #include <symbol/kallsyms.h>
> > > @@ -2710,10 +2711,13 @@ static int find_prev_cpumode(struct ip_callchain *chain, struct thread *thread,
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static u64 get_leaf_frame_caller(struct perf_sample *sample __maybe_unused,
> > > - struct thread *thread __maybe_unused, int usr_idx __maybe_unused)
> > > +static u64 get_leaf_frame_caller(struct perf_sample *sample,
> > > + struct thread *thread, int usr_idx)
> > > {
> > > - return 0;
> > > + if (machine__normalize_is(thread->maps->machine, "arm64"))
> > > + return get_leaf_frame_caller_aarch64(sample, thread, usr_idx);
> > > + else
> > > + return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
> > > @@ -3114,14 +3118,19 @@ int machine__set_current_tid(struct machine *machine, int cpu, pid_t pid,
> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > - * Compares the raw arch string. N.B. see instead perf_env__arch() if a
> > > - * normalized arch is needed.
> > > + * Compares the raw arch string. N.B. see instead perf_env__arch() or
> > > + * machine__normalize_is() if a normalized arch is needed.
> > > */
> > > bool machine__is(struct machine *machine, const char *arch)
> > > {
> > > return machine && !strcmp(perf_env__raw_arch(machine->env), arch);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +bool machine__normalize_is(struct machine *machine, const char *arch)
> > > +{
> > > + return machine && !strcmp(perf_env__arch(machine->env), arch);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int machine__nr_cpus_avail(struct machine *machine)
> > > {
> > > return machine ? perf_env__nr_cpus_avail(machine->env) : 0;
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.h b/tools/perf/util/machine.h
> > > index a143087eeb47..665535153411 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.h
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.h
> > > @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ static inline bool machine__is_host(struct machine *machine)
> > > }
> > >
> > > bool machine__is(struct machine *machine, const char *arch);
> > > +bool machine__normalize_is(struct machine *machine, const char *arch);
> > > int machine__nr_cpus_avail(struct machine *machine);
> > >
> > > struct thread *__machine__findnew_thread(struct machine *machine, pid_t pid, pid_t tid);
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists