[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3dS=Ne0Pd2qZc8vB2whM7AUcJ1BNbhtf6EEboWAPpSug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:09:30 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
liush <liush@...winnertech.com>, wefu@...hat.com,
Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>, wangjunqiang@...as.ac.cn,
Wei Wu (吴伟) <lazyparser@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] riscv: Fixup difference with defconfig
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 5:35 PM <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> Let's follow the origin patch's spirit.
>
> The only difference between rv32_defconfig and defconfig is that
> rv32_defconfig has CONFIG_ARCH_RV32I=y.
>
> This is helpful to compare rv64-compat-rv32 v.s. rv32-linux.
>
If the intention is to keep them in sync, maybe use a fragment for 32-bit
mode, like powerpc or mips do.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists