[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c55af047-3207-fb42-19ee-71f2e18e60ac@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:31:18 +0100
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes
tree
Hi Stephen,
Am 22.12.21 um 04:50 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 67f74302f45d ("drm/nouveau: wait for the exclusive fence after the shared ones v2")
>
> from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit:
>
> 40298cb45071 ("drm/nouveau: use the new iterator in nouveau_fence_sync")
>
> from the drm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just used the latter version) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
That will cause a performance regression in linux-next for nouveau users.
The real fix is already queued up for merging into drm-next. So no
immediately action item here.
Just keep it in the back of your mind in case any nouveau users starts
to complain about the performance in linux-next.
Thanks,
Christian.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists