lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcLYz0x5oawOEHnI@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Dec 2021 23:50:39 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        francisco.munoz.ruiz@...ux.intel.com, nirmal.patel@...ux.intel.com,
        jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
        hch@...radead.org, kw@...ux.com, robh@...nel.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, michael.a.bottini@...ux.intel.com,
        rafael@...nel.org, me@...ityamohan.in, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] PCI: vmd: Override ASPM on TGL/ADL VMD devices

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 01:11:26PM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> The reason why BIOS is not programming these values is because when VMD is
> enabled the ports are not visible to BIOS. This would apply to any BIOS
> including those used by ChromeOS.
> And because BIOS doesn't see these ports ...

Isn't VMD enabled by the BIOS?  The bios should be able see them the
same way as Linux does.  But given that the whole point of VMD is to hide 
these ports from Windows it obviously doesn't.  For Linux and thus for
ChromeOS VMD is completely pointless, so give that the ChromeOS people
aren't as dumb as some people at Intel I'm pretty sure they won't enable
it and just use the ports as normal one and avoid this whole
self-inflicted pain.

If only Intel could give the OS a way to disable VMD at runtime and
discover the actual ports, then we would not have this whole nightmare
of having to support it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ