[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211222091910.GA5159@thinkpad>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:49:10 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
Subject: Re: Question about node naming in [PATCH v3 13/18] ARM: dts: qcom:
sdx55: Add spmi node
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 12:42:25PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 09:27:17PM +0100, David Heidelberg wrote:
> > Hello Manivannan,
> >
> > I'd like to ask, if you had any particular reason to name node `qcom,spmi@`
> > instead of basic `spmi@`.
> >
>
> "spmi" node label was not documented by devicetree spec at that time. So I was
> using "qcom,spmi" but it was not correct either.
>
> I've submitted a PR now to devicetree-spec repo [1] for listing it as the
> generic node name. So once it got accepted, we can use "spmi@" for the node
> name.
>
PR is merged now. So you can proceed with using "spmi" node name in all dts.
Thanks,
Mani
> Thanks,
> Mani
>
> [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/pull/50
>
> > I'm currently converting binding for
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb and I'm
> > considering adding qcom,spmi into qcom,spmi-pmic-arb or just rename this and
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi `qcom,spmi@` occurences to `spmi@`.
> >
> > Ideas, inputs?
> >
> > Thank you
> > David
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists