lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Dec 2021 21:15:36 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the folio-iomap tree with the nvdimm
 tree

Hi all,

FIXME: Add owner of second tree to To:
       Add author(s)/SOB of conflicting commits.

Today's linux-next merge of the folio-iomap tree got a conflict in:

  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c

between commit:

  de291b590286 ("iomap: turn the byte variable in iomap_zero_iter into a ssize_t")

from the nvdimm tree and commits:

  a25def1fe568 ("iomap: Convert __iomap_zero_iter to use a folio")
  4d7bd0eb72e5 ("iomap: Inline __iomap_zero_iter into its caller")

from the folio-iomap tree.

I fixed it up (following Matthew's suggestion, I ended up with the
below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index ff541190fc73,c6b3a148e898..c938bbad075e
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@@ -888,21 -908,34 +907,25 @@@ static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct io
  		return length;
  
  	do {
- 		unsigned offset = offset_in_page(pos);
- 		ssize_t bytes = min_t(u64, PAGE_SIZE - offset, length);
- 		struct page *page;
+ 		struct folio *folio;
  		int status;
+ 		size_t offset;
+ 		size_t bytes = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, length);
  
- 		status = iomap_write_begin(iter, pos, bytes, &page);
 -		if (IS_DAX(iter->inode)) {
 -			s64 tmp = dax_iomap_zero(pos, bytes, iomap);
 -			if (tmp < 0)
 -				return tmp;
 -			bytes = tmp;
 -			goto good;
 -		}
 -
+ 		status = iomap_write_begin(iter, pos, bytes, &folio);
  		if (status)
  			return status;
  
- 		zero_user(page, offset, bytes);
- 		mark_page_accessed(page);
+ 		offset = offset_in_folio(folio, pos);
+ 		if (bytes > folio_size(folio) - offset)
+ 			bytes = folio_size(folio) - offset;
  
- 		bytes = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, bytes, page);
- 		if (bytes < 0)
- 			return bytes;
+ 		folio_zero_range(folio, offset, bytes);
+ 		folio_mark_accessed(folio);
+ 
+ 		bytes = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, bytes, folio);
 -good:
+ 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bytes == 0))
+ 			return -EIO;
  
  		pos += bytes;
  		length -= bytes;

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ