[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcMEa7aEXKrgjwuG@google.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:56:43 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
Pavel Dubrova <pashadubrova@...il.com>,
Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] backlight: qcom-wled: fix and solidify handling
of enabled-strings
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2021-11-16 15:42:15, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Lee
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:34:50PM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > > > This patchset fixes WLED's handling of enabled-strings: besides some
> > > > cleanup it is now actually possible to specify a non-contiguous array of
> > > > enabled strings (not necessarily starting at zero) and the values from
> > > > DT are now validated to prevent possible unexpected out-of-bounds
> > > > register and array element accesses.
> > > > Off-by-one mistakes in the maximum number of strings, also causing
> > > > out-of-bounds access, have been addressed as well.
> > >
> > > They have arrived piecemeal (during v1, v2 and v3) but all patches on
> > > the set should now have my R-b: attached to them.
> >
> > I can see that. Nothing for you to worry about.
> >
> > I'll apply these when I conduct my next sweep, thanks.
>
> Thanks for that Lee! Has the next sweep already passed by? Seems
> everyone is preparing for the 5.17 merge window but these patches
> haven't yet landed on the backlight tree [1]. I'd appreciate it if we
> can make them appear in the 5.17 window :)
No need to panic.
v5.17-rc1 isn't due to be cut for either 3.5 or 4.5 weeks.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists