linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFT] blk-mq: optimize queue tag busy iter for shared

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e50cfdcd-110b-d778-6e3f-edfed9b1c5a4@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:35:22 +0000
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>, <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC:     <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Sathya Prakash Veerichetty <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] blk-mq: optimize queue tag busy iter for shared_tags

On 22/12/2021 11:20, Kashyap Desai wrote:
> Yes, above is the same changes I was looking for. I did very basic mistake.
> I applied your above commit while doing megaraid_sas testing.
>   While I move to mpi3mr testing, I did not apply your patch set. 

But I did not think that my patch would help mpi3mr since it does not 
use host_tagset.

> We can drop
> request of this RFT since I tested above series and it serve the same
> purpose.

ok, fine.

And just to confirm, do you now think that we need to fix any older 
kernel with some backport of my changes? I think that we would just need 
to consider 5.16 (when it becomes stable), 5.15, and and 5.10

Thanks,
John