[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcMVpesszGG2EABJ@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:10:13 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, paolo.valente@...aro.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-4.19.y 0/5] fix memleak of bfq weights_tree node
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 07:38:44PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Our test found that bfq_weight_counter can leak quite easy. This problem
> can be fixed by patch 4, and other patches is needed to backport patch
> 4.
>
> Federico Motta (2):
> block, bfq: improve asymmetric scenarios detection
> block, bfq: fix asymmetric scenarios detection
>
> Paolo Valente (3):
> block, bfq: fix decrement of num_active_groups
> block, bfq: fix queue removal from weights tree
> block, bfq: fix use after free in bfq_bfqq_expire
>
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 287 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> block/bfq-iosched.h | 76 +++++++++---
> block/bfq-wf2q.c | 56 +++++----
> 3 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
All now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists