[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a165oWeGOgsM=U3F54e4HFvhJxr2sG0qoGLOe_WK8qAtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:30:24 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
liush <liush@...winnertech.com>, Wei Fu <wefu@...hat.com>,
Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>,
Wang Junqiang <wangjunqiang@...as.ac.cn>,
Wei Wu (吴伟) <lazyparser@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] riscv: Fixup difference with defconfig
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:06 PM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 8:51 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:34 PM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Given that there are no specific rv32 SoC implementations supported
> > by the kernel today (other than SOC_VIRT), the number of users
> > would be close to zero anyway.
> I really agree with you, but we still need the rv32 user mode
> ecosystem for memory footprint.
Sure, I just meant there are few users that would have to relearn typing
"make defconfig 32-bit.config" instead of "make rv32_defconfig" even
without the added Makefile target.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists