lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98a574a2-45c3-5d7c-6405-0cd279a81816@lemmela.net>
Date:   Wed, 22 Dec 2021 16:27:36 +0200
From:   Oskari Lemmelä <oskari@...mela.net>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: ar934x: fix transfer size


On 22.12.2021 14.32, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 07:59:57AM +0200, Oskari Lemmela wrote:
>> If bits_per_word is configured, transfer only word amount
>> of data per iteration.
> Does this actually materially affect what the hardware does?  How much
> data is transferred in an internal loop in the driver is completely
> immaterial, bits per word only matters for formatting of the transferred
> data.
I don't have logic analyzator to verify what hardware actual does.
I tested this with transferring 32bits to ATSAMD20J15 slave.
Running loop in 8bits or 16bits, transfer is done correctly without
any errors. When running loop in 24bits or 32bits directly I got
error from spi_sync_transfer.

Oskari

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ