linux-kernel - Re: remove set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:55:59 +0100 (CET)
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     bp <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     hch <hch@....de>, anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        x86 <x86@...nel.org>, linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: remove set_fs for UML

Boris,

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "bp" <bp@...en8.de>
> An: "hch" <hch@....de>
> CC: "richard" <richard@....at>, "anton ivanov" <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>, "x86" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-um"
> <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2021 14:55:39
> Betreff: Re: remove set_fs for UML

> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:17:53AM +0100, hch wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:05:03PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> > So far UML seems to work with these changes applied. :-)
>> > I have applied both patches to my UML tree for now, I assume x86 maintainers are
>> > fine with
>> > patch 1/2?
>> 
>> Looks like patch 1 needs this fixup for some configurations, where
>> pci.h doesn't get pulled into kvm by other means.
>> 
>> But we probably want an ACK from the x86 maintainers to be sure anyway..
> 
> I don't see why not so
> 
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> 
> Should I take the first one along with this hunk below?

Would be great!
When I'll drop "x86/mtrr: remove the mtrr_bp_init stub" from the UML tree.
 
Thanks,
//richard