[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adce9591-0cf2-f771-25b9-2eebea05f1bc@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 06:16:17 +0000
From: <Ajay.Kathat@...rochip.com>
To: <davidm@...uge.net>
CC: <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>, <kvalo@...nel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/50] wilc1000: rework tx path to use sk_buffs
throughout
On 23/12/21 06:44, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> OK, so I'm nervous about such a large patch series, but it took a lot
> of work to break things down into atomic changes. This should be it
> for the transmit path as far as I'm concerned.
Thanks David for the efforts to break down the changes. I am still
reviewing and testing the previous series and found some inconsistent
results. I am not sure about the cause of the difference. For some
tests, the throughput is improved(~1Mbps) but for some CI tests, the
throughput is less compared(~1Mbps in same range) to the previous.
Though not observed much difference.
Now the new patches are added to the same series so it is difficult to
review them in one go.
I have a request, incase there are new patches please include them in
separate series. Breaking down the patch helps to identify the non
related changes which can go in separate series. The patches(change) may
be related to TX path flow but can go in separate series.
Regards,
Ajay
Powered by blists - more mailing lists