[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2350bea8-1ca0-0945-2084-77a3c7f54f27@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:23:54 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....nxp.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@...il.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] driver core: Set DMA ownership during driver
bind/unbind
On 12/23/21 3:13 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 11:02:54AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On 12/22/21 8:47 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void device_dma_cleanup(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>>>> +{
>>>> + if (!dev->bus->dma_configure)
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!drv->suppress_auto_claim_dma_owner)
>>>> + iommu_device_release_dma_owner(dev, DMA_OWNER_DMA_API);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>>>> {
>>>> bool test_remove = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE) &&
>>>> @@ -574,11 +601,8 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>>>> if (ret)
>>>> goto pinctrl_bind_failed;
>>>> - if (dev->bus->dma_configure) {
>>>> - ret = dev->bus->dma_configure(dev);
>>>> - if (ret)
>>>> - goto probe_failed;
>>>> - }
>>>> + if (device_dma_configure(dev, drv))
>>>> + goto pinctrl_bind_failed;
>>> Are you sure you are jumping to the proper error path here? It is not
>>> obvious why you changed this.
>> The error handling path in really_probe() seems a bit wrong. For
>> example,
>>
>> 572 /* If using pinctrl, bind pins now before probing */
>> 573 ret = pinctrl_bind_pins(dev);
>> 574 if (ret)
>> 575 goto pinctrl_bind_failed;
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> 663 pinctrl_bind_failed:
>> 664 device_links_no_driver(dev);
>> 665 devres_release_all(dev);
>> 666 arch_teardown_dma_ops(dev);
>> 667 kfree(dev->dma_range_map);
>> 668 dev->dma_range_map = NULL;
>> 669 driver_sysfs_remove(dev);
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> 670 dev->driver = NULL;
>> 671 dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
>> 672 if (dev->pm_domain && dev->pm_domain->dismiss)
>> 673 dev->pm_domain->dismiss(dev);
>> 674 pm_runtime_reinit(dev);
>> 675 dev_pm_set_driver_flags(dev, 0);
>> 676 done:
>> 677 return ret;
>>
>> The driver_sysfs_remove() will be called even driver_sysfs_add() hasn't
>> been called yet. I can fix this in a separated patch if I didn't miss
>> anything.
> If this is a bug in the existing kernel, please submit it as a separate
> patch so that it can be properly backported to all affected kernels.
> Never bury it in an unrelated change that will never get sent to older
> kernels.
Sure! I will. Thank you!
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists