linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ALSA: hda/tegra: Fix Tegra194 HDA reset failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84e3ab9d-b351-b4b6-aa34-174725166913@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:54:09 +0530
From:   Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, tiwai@...e.com,
        broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        thierry.reding@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        mkumard@...dia.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ALSA: hda/tegra: Fix Tegra194 HDA reset failure



On 12/23/2021 12:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:04:19AM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
>>
>> On 12/23/2021 12:10 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> 22.12.2021 07:35, Sameer Pujar пишет:
>>>> HDA regression is recently reported on Tegra194 based platforms.
>>>> This happens because "hda2codec_2x" reset does not really exist
>>>> in Tegra194 and it causes probe failure. All the HDA based audio
>>>> tests fail at the moment. This underlying issue is exposed by
>>>> commit c045ceb5a145 ("reset: tegra-bpmp: Handle errors in BPMP
>>>> response") which now checks return code of BPMP command response.
>>>> Fix this issue by skipping unavailable reset on Tegra194.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
>>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Depends-on: 87f0e46e7559 ("ALSA: hda/tegra: Reset hardware")
>>> Is "Depends-on" a valid tag? I can't find it in Documentation/.
>> I do find the usage of the tag in many commits though there is no reference
>> of this in doc. I always thought it would act as a reference when commits
>> get pulled to other branches. If this is not true and it does not mean
>> anything, I will drop this.
> It is not true at all, please read:
>      https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> for how to do this properly.

Thanks Greg for the pointer. I will drop above tag in v4.